On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 9:01 AM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote:
> well IMHO we can definitely have everything 7 mandatory... > I'm fine with that, but I think we should at least bump minor version of a plugin when this happens. /Anders > > On 5 May 2017 at 16:45, Anders Hammar <and...@hammar.net> wrote: > > > How would we handle this wrt versions of our plugins when the > requirements > > for those are bumped from Java 6 to Java 7? > > > > For example, maven-jar-plugin has plexus-archiver as a dependency. > m-jar-p > > v3.0.2 requires Java 6. Is a bump to v3.1.0 enough for going to Java 7? > > > > /Anders > > > > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:39 PM, Michael Osipov <micha...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > five months ago I asked about Java 7 upgrade of Plexus Archiver [1] and > > > received no reaction. I will move to a new major and integrate Plamen's > > > changes. > > > > > > Additionally, he was so kind to work on Plexus IO too and remove all > pre > > > Java 7 code [2]. I will raise major too and merge his changes. > > > > > > This will effectively will change a lot of our codebase to Java 7. > > > > > > If I won't receive any profound objection, the PRs will be merged. > > > > > > Michael > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/codehaus-plexus/plexus-archiver/pull/55 > > > [2] https://github.com/codehaus-plexus/plexus-io/pull/5 > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Olivier Lamy > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy >
