On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 17:46:10 +0100, Hervé BOUTEMY <[email protected]>
wrote:
Le dimanche 10 décembre 2017, 11:06:32 CET Robert Scholte a écrit :
I still think it is ugly to use the HR for this kind of info.
If you *really* want this info, I'd prefer a new line, offering more
space
for additional info.
yes, I *really* want this info: the precise details on how to display it
is
less important
Other option is to leave it as it is. If developers want it, they can
put
it in the name.
the idea is that ${project.packaging} drives the default build, before
additional plugins bindings: it's useful to display it as it is a key
info
So -1 for me.
how do you want to proceed to choose the best display?
Is it acceptable to add it to the "Reactor Build Order"? It has enough
space for this kind of information.
Regards,
Hervé
Robert
On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 11:01:41 +0100, Hervé BOUTEMY
<[email protected]>
wrote:
> is there a seconder for this enhancement?
>
> CI:
>
https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-3.x-jenkinsfile/
> job/MNG-6308_display_packaging/
>
> Jira issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6308
>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
