The question is maybe about what is realistic for Maven devs. Shading the CPI package (to something like org.apache.maven.cdi.*) would be maybe the case instead of removing the original CDI and reinventing the wheel.
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 7:52 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY <[email protected]> wrote: > and does the MNG issue contain a reproducible test case for us to > investigate > more precisely? > > Regards, > > Hervé > > Le lundi 5 février 2018, 22:11:56 CET Robert Scholte a écrit : > > Is there a MNG[1] issue? > > > > Robert > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG > > > > On Sat, 03 Feb 2018 16:29:49 +0100, Romain Manni-Bucau > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Up? > > > > > > Le 19 janv. 2018 13:18, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <[email protected]> a > > > > > > écrit : > > >> Hi guys, > > >> > > >> cdi-api is still in maven lib and breaks any plugin using it since it > is > > >> an old version, can it be dropped or at least isolated from plugin > > >> classloaders? > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> Romain Manni-Bucau > > >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > >> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > > >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github > > >> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > > >> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
