The e-mail went out. The vote has started. Should I mention how to run the build with other JDK and follow the README.md on GitHub?
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 8:16 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote: > Il ven 2 mar 2018, 19:43 Tibor Digana <tibordig...@apache.org> ha scritto: > > > I will close the Jira Version and I will complete all preparation for the > > release vote tomorrow morning. > > > > Great! > Enrico > > > > > On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 6:02 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > I see SUREFIRE 1491 is on master, eo we have a green light? > > > Thank you Tibor > > > > > > Il gio 1 mar 2018, 22:38 Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> ha scritto: > > > > > > > Ok Sounds good. > > > > But could we just focus on a new release rather than new issues? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 1 March 2018 at 14:20, Tibor Digana <tibordig...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > There is a branch SUREFIRE-1491 waiting for pushing to master. It > is > > > open > > > > > for everybody who want to check it: > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=maven-surefire. > > > > > git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/SUREFIRE-1491 > > > > > Here is the Jenkins build link > > > > > https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-wip/job/maven-surefire/ > > > > > job/SUREFIRE-1491/ > > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > Tibor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 4:24 AM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > Inline > > > > > > > > > > > > On 1 March 2018 at 12:55, Tibor Digana <tibordig...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Olivier, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please do not make it yet - I am in progress with fixing. > > > > > > > I am still running several branches on Jenkins. The Jira issues > > in > > > > > 2.21.0 > > > > > > > match branch name, as for instance today's SUREFIRE-1491. > > > > > > > After 1491 the next ones will be cosmetic changes - quite fast > to > > > do. > > > > > > > I would like to start the vote in the weekend. So we have been > > > > working > > > > > > with > > > > > > > Robert Scholte and me quite a lot on this release, please let > us > > > > finish > > > > > > it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't mind doing myself the release. I don't have any need > > neither > > > > pay > > > > > > any attention of of having my name attached to a release!! > > > > > > I just want to get this done ASAP. As a user (a non friendly one > in > > > > this > > > > > > case :-) ) I'm very disappointed to not be able to test my > projects > > > > with > > > > > > jdk10. > > > > > > So I'm simply rocking the boat to get this done! > > > > > > So if you prefer doing the release by yourself please do it! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then 3.0.0-M1 would be yours, Olivier and most probably > everybody > > > > would > > > > > > > appreciate new API and Java 1.7 including me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In the next release 3.0.0-M1 we can cherrypick and squash > commits > > > > from > > > > > > the > > > > > > > existing branch 3.0-rc1 together and you Olivier can make a > > > release. > > > > > > > The JUnit Users would expect release of our new provider asap, > so > > > we > > > > > have > > > > > > > to cherrypick and squash commits from branch junit5 in Version > > > > 3.0.0-M2 > > > > > > and > > > > > > > add a statement to documentation saying that JUnit5 has > > incomplete > > > > > > > feature-matrix against JUnit47 and we call it experimental > > provider > > > > > > because > > > > > > > we do not have all feature ITs covered. > > > > > > > Both (3.0-API and JUnit5) are actually very urgent, so they > > should > > > > > follow > > > > > > > right after current Version 2.21.0. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sure so we don't have to delay 2.21.0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why M1, M2, etc, because we with Kristian and Andreas wanted to > > > > change > > > > > > the > > > > > > > system properties of config params to something like surefire.* > > and > > > > > > > failsafe.* and include interfaces to some config params with > > > > > > > "implements=..." which would customize the plugins without > asking > > > us > > > > to > > > > > > do > > > > > > > in ASF. Some prototype was done but it did not go with > > > > > "implements=...". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Additionally, we have to release 3.0.0-M3 with reworked > > > communication > > > > > > > between processes (maven -> surefire) because the execution > hangs > > > > with > > > > > > > pipes and I found a bug in JDK in maven-shared-utils. We have > > some > > > > > > > prototype with sockets but pipes must stay as an config > > > alternative. > > > > > This > > > > > > > includes changes in the data format sent over pipes and sockets > > > which > > > > > is > > > > > > on > > > > > > > my PC and not in any public branch. With this fix we will close > > all > > > > > known > > > > > > > critical Jiras. > > > > > > > I could not do it earlier, sorry. There's been a quite a lot of > > > > > > > requirements so far from Users and us ASF. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > Tibor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 12:14 AM, Olivier Lamy < > ol...@apache.org> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > Any objections to cut a release? > > > > > > > > If not, I can do this early next week > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Olivier Lamy > > > > > > > > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Olivier Lamy > > > > > > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Olivier Lamy > > > > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > -- Enrico Olivelli > > > > > > -- > > > -- Enrico Olivelli >
