Non binding but agreed - once an issue list gets beyond 50 it's hard to see the forest, once it's beyond 100 you can pretty much guarantee that everyone is lost.
Cheers, Martijn On 8 March 2018 at 07:45, Anders Hammar <and...@hammar.net> wrote: > +1 for the same process as last time. > > /Anders > > On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 11:31 PM, Michael Osipov <micha...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Folks, > > > > I did yet another analysis on open issues. We have currently more than > 400 > > open issues which haven't been touched for more than three (3) years. > > > > The last two times I autoclosed them with a message. People could request > > a reopen, very little did. > > > > Should we do this again? The list won't get shorter and a lot of them do > > not even contain a sample project. > > > > JIRA query: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=category%20%3D% > > 20Maven%20AND%20updated%20%3C%3D%20-156w%20AND%20resolution% > > 20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC > > > > Please comment! > > > > Michael > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > >
