Hi Dejan, I almost forgot your email. Pls create a PR on GitHub with a little work even if still incomplete but at least we would not forget it. As you can see in [1] we should create release branches and for your PR as well. [1]: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/227
Cheers Tibor On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 9:24 AM Dejan Stojadinovic <dejan2...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanx Tibor, I left short comments on JIRA issues (just to mark them). > I hope I will squeeze first github PR in a few days. > > Regards, > Dejan > > On 2019/03/24 23:19:08, Tibor Digana <tibordig...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi Dejan, > > > > Good to hear. In our Jira are two issues related to my original email: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1654 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1494 > > If you have any questions, feel free to ask here. > > Pls run the build locally (mvn -P run-its install) until our TravisCI > build > > would be ready for you. The build takes cca 1 hour to complete. > > We should solve these two issue in two separate pull requests. > > I guess these tasks require very good preparation and analysis of ITs > > before making any changes. > > > > @Enrico can you pls investigate TravisCI, why it still behaves so much > > differently from Jenkins CI and fails? > > Is it really due to the deployed SNAPSHOT versions at ASF Nexus? > > > > Thx > > > > Cheers > > Tibor > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 3:23 PM Dejan Stojadinovic <dejan2...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Tibor, > > > > > > I volunteer for this. I have a solid experience with maven usage and > also > > > contributed few (easy) maven commits: > > > https://github.com/apache/maven/commits?author=dejan2609 > > > > > > Regards, > > > Dejan Stojadinović > > > > > > On 2019/03/23 21:47:04, Tibor Digana <tibordig...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > It's going to be very pedant work for someone who want to help us in > > > > Surefire. > > > > > > > > I am looking for some volunteer who will remove the deprecated config > > > param > > > > `forkMode` in favor of `forkCount`. All our ITs should use > `forkCount` > > > > since then. > > > > > > > > Additionally, the volunteer should deprecate `surefire-junit4` > provider. > > > > Instead `surefire-junit47` provider should be selected as default > > > provider > > > > for JUnit4 tests. Again the ITs should be changed and plugin > dependencies > > > > should use `surefire-junit4` provider in place where it was not > > > specified. > > > > > > > > It's easy to do. When you see the usages of `.forkMode()` method - > only > > > 20 > > > > in `surefire-its` and 43 usages of `<forkMode>` in > > > > `surefire-its/src/test/resources`. > > > > > > > > Successful build must prove that the changes have been applied > correctly. > > > > The changes should be in a pull request on GitHub. > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > Tibor > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >
