In my opinion release notes should tell:
- new features/news and noteworthy
- user visible changes
- breaking changes

I would add a list of contributors.
The list of 'reporters' is not useful.

I see we are doing those lists in order to have a better engagement with
the community, but I am not sure at 100% it is something that should stay
forever on the website, maybe it can be in the announcement email.

I have used the release notes of 3.6.1 as template, to me it is not a
problem to shrink the list making some sort of select
'distict(reportername)', distinct(contributor name).

Enrico

Il sab 31 ago 2019, 11:17 Tibor Digana <tibordig...@apache.org> ha scritto:

> For me and many users the Release Note like this are very hard to read and
> hard to find what is needed.
> Many times they go to google because it's easier to search than walking
> through all versions of release notes.
>
> We do not have a cumulative documentation with a list of features and we
> often point to release notes whenever any uaser is asking about feature or
> for a problem that he has in his build.
>
> If it was only up to me, I would have the cumulative documentation(s) which
> is in one folder, and another documents would be Jira Report generated by
> "reporting" and this would include the author in the table - easy and
> automated.
> IMO it should be just like in the plugins - every feature fully documented
> in src/site/../*.apt and pushed with the code and tests to master in one
> commit.
>
> Then the Release Notes would be a matter of command line "mvn site ...".
>
> On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 10:45 AM Robert Scholte <rfscho...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > The goal of release notes is that they are being read.
> > There should be a good balance of the amount of information, preventing
> > people to say TLDR;
> >
> > A long list of 'MNG-NNNN John Doe' doesn't provide me useful information.
> > The list of 'MNG-NNNN A good JIRA title' is useful and visiting the
> > related Jira page will provide you the extra information, including the
> > actual reporter and contributors.
> >
> > Summing up a list of names that helped on the release is a good way to
> > appreciate their help on this release.
> >
> > Robert
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 31 Aug 2019 08:33:15 +0200, Tibor Digana <tibordig...@apache.org
> >
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > We should use authors of the issue/PR/idea.
> > > After the release we can ask WHY (practical goals) he wanted the
> feature
> > > more than how. The question for "HOW" has to be placed very early
> during
> > > the review, but too late after the PR has been merged.
> > > I expect that the reviewer developer has checked all the code, so there
> > > would not be questions about *how* it is done. If the reviewer does not
> > > understand the code and he admits the change, then it is question for
> him
> > > whenever a new trouble happens.
> > > So this is my opinion - listing the author(s) of the idea in every
> > > issue/PR.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 10:40 PM Robert Scholte <rfscho...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Not sure if the reader of the release notes is helped with a long list
> > >> of
> > >> reporters and contributers per issue.
> > >> I would expect that only a list of (unique) names is good enough.
> > >>
> > >> If there is someone that deserves extra credits, I'd say it is Stefan
> > >> Oehme for diving into the code, looking for memory leaks AND providing
> > >> patches to solve it.
> > >>
> > >> thanks for pushing this release!
> > >> Robert
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 22:02:31 +0200, Enrico Olivelli
> > >> <eolive...@gmail.com>
> > >>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hi all,
> > >> > I have sent a draft of the release notes for 3.6.2
> > >> >
> > >> > this is the PR
> > >> > https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/99/files
> > >> >
> > >> > Feel free to add comments or push fixes directly to the branch.
> > >> >
> > >> > It still lacks a bit of formatting, but the content is ready
> > >> >
> > >> > Cheers
> > >> > Enrico
> > >>
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> > >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to