I am referring to this sentence: "The logic of using : in these prefix names is that it would expressly be impossible to invoke these dynamic pseudo phases from the CLI as Maven will interpret any attempt to invoke them as $plugin:$goal and look for a maven-before-plugin or maven-after-plugin".
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 11:13 PM Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri 25 Oct 2019 at 21:41, Tamás Cservenák <ta...@cservenak.net> wrote: > > > The fixed phases were one of the main strengths of Maven, and with this > > automatism it could really be enhanced. > > > > My dislike: the `before:goal` invocation is being "projected" to non > > existent plugin invocation. This sounds like a hack. Could we clear that > > part up? > > > Could you explain what you mean? I’m not seeing what you are saying > > > > > > T > > > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 10:23 PM Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > Le 25/10/2019 à 21:01, Stephen Connolly a écrit : > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Dynamic+phases > > > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > Sounds interesting. You may want to forbid the before/after prefix on > > > the deprecated phases (such as after:pre-clean). > > > > > > The name of the phases use to start with a verb, that would no longer > be > > > true with the proposed 'sources' and 'resources' phases. Since it isn't > > > that common to invoke these phases directly from the command line maybe > > > the longer name could be retained to preserve the consistency > > > (generate-sources, etc). > > > > > > Emmanuel Bourg > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > > > > > > -- > Sent from my phone >
