Le lun. 4 mai 2020 à 17:06, Stephane Nicoll <stephane.nic...@gmail.com> a
écrit :

> Thanks but that doesn't really answer my question. That version is picked
> up by dependency management of the project as far as I can tell. If a
> project does provide an older junit engine version the build will break.
>
> If you meant to "force" a single version then I'd argue that you shouldn't
> resolve the one provided in dependency management for the project. I also
> find this change quite suspicious in a maintenance release.
>
>
Long story short the first jupiter integration contributed by junit team
was supporting a single version.
This is what is in 2.x of surefire.
This maintenance release just upgraded the version as requested in a ticket
IIRC but didn't change the way it is loaded (which is done on master).


>
>
> On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 5:03 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Stephane,
> >
> > AFAIK the choice with 2.22 maintenance for now was to keep using a single
> > junit5 version as originally and if only support more flexibility with
> 3.x.
> > Think it makes sense for now but if you want to PR 2.22 to backport 3.x
> > work I guess it can be discussed too in another thread.
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > <
> >
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> > >
> >
> >
> > Le lun. 4 mai 2020 à 16:35, Stephane Nicoll <stephane.nic...@gmail.com>
> a
> > écrit :
> >
> > > An update. This may be the other fixed issue in that release actually
> > > (SUREFIRE-1764). Is JUnit engine 1.6.1 now mandatory? What happens for
> > > projects that are using an older JUnit version?
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 3:59 PM Stephane Nicoll <
> > stephane.nic...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I am not sure that SUREFIRE-1679 is fixed. I've ran the Spring Boot
> > build
> > > > with 2.22.2 and reproduced the error there. Upgrading to this
> candidate
> > > > release and I got this error.
> > > >
> > > > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> > > > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:2.22.3:test
> > (default-test)
> > > > on project spring-boot-configuration-metadata: There are test
> failures.
> > > > [ERROR]
> > > > [ERROR] Please refer to
> > > >
> > >
> >
> /Users/snicoll/workspace/work/spring-boot/2.2.x/spring-boot-project/spring-boot-tools/spring-boot-configuration-metadata/target/surefire-reports
> > > > for the individual test results.
> > > > [ERROR] Please refer to dump files (if any exist) [date].dump,
> > > > [date]-jvmRun[N].dump and [date].dumpstream.
> > > > [ERROR] There was an error in the forked process
> > > > [ERROR] java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
> > > > org/junit/platform/engine/EngineDiscoveryListener
> > > > [ERROR] org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooterForkException:
> > > > There was an error in the forked process
> > > > [ERROR] java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
> > > > org/junit/platform/engine/EngineDiscoveryListener
> > > > [ERROR] at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.maven.plugin.surefire.booterclient.ForkStarter.fork(ForkStarter.java:656)
> > > > [ERROR] at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.maven.plugin.surefire.booterclient.ForkStarter.run(ForkStarter.java:282)
> > > > [ERROR] at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.maven.plugin.surefire.booterclient.ForkStarter.run(ForkStarter.java:245)
> > > > [ERROR] at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.maven.plugin.surefire.AbstractSurefireMojo.executeProvider(AbstractSurefireMojo.java:1186)
> > > > [ERROR] at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.maven.plugin.surefire.AbstractSurefireMojo.executeAfterPreconditionsChecked(AbstractSurefireMojo.java:1014)
> > > > [ERROR] at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.maven.plugin.surefire.AbstractSurefireMojo.execute(AbstractSurefireMojo.java:860)
> > > >
> > > > See https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-boot/issues/19631
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 11:44 PM Tibor Digana <tibordig...@apache.org
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi,
> > > >>
> > > >> We solved 2 issues:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317927&version=12345472
> > > >>
> > > >> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20SUREFIRE%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> > > >>
> > > >> Staging repo:
> > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1572/
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1572/org/apache/maven/surefire/surefire/2.22.3/surefire-2.22.3-source-release.zip
> > > >>
> > > >> Source release checksum(s):
> > > >>
> > > >> surefire-2.22.3-source-release.zip sha512::
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> c1533ed45fd3119d028a4914ca7557acfbfea5218b5536bbafeed4b33845486b976f20b39334e2917636e3739240478ca46bd25a0dc011e5fb2aa85033e9e959
> > > >> surefire-2.22.3-source-release.zip sha1:
> > > >> 2db957105d2929911927482c8d2198bd6ef718a7
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Staging site:
> > > >> N/A - we do not want to override new site with old versions 2.22.x
> > > >>
> > > >> Guide to testing staged releases:
> > > >>
> > http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html
> > > >>
> > > >> Vote open for 72 hours.
> > > >>
> > > >> [ ] +1
> > > >> [ ] +0
> > > >> [ ] -1
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> Cheers
> > > >> Tibor
> > > >>
> > > >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to