> -----Original Message----- > From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 12 May 2004 21:14 > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: Re: standard name for license file > > On Thu, 2004-05-13 at 00:03, Michal Maczka wrote: > > Jason van Zyl wrote: > > > > >Hi, > > > > > >Did we ever decide on a standard name for the license file? I'm already > > >catching a couple variations in the upload bundles so if we haven't > > >decided already can we pick a file name as I would like to convert it > > >to: > > > > > ><artifactId>-<version>.license > > > > > >When uploading into ibiblio. > > > > > > > > > > > I like the idea .. but what about projects whith multiple licenses? > > Maybe add the lic type in there: > > <artifactId>-<version>-<lic-id>.license ?
I'd prefer to keep the standard <some name>-<version>.<extension> (i.e. keep version the last element of the artifact name). > > Where lic id might be standard abbreviations/ids used at > > http://www.opensource.org/licenses/ > Isn't it possible that a dual-license project has the dual license defined in a single license file? Does it have to be in 2 files? > The <license/> element in the POM would probably have to be augmented to > have an id things mesh. We only have a <name/> and <url/> element right > now. We definitely need to deal with multiple lics. -Vincent --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
