Guess we can do something like that or more js like http://tomee.apache.org/developer/classloading/index.html but specific to maven, mojo classloading is almost obvious but core and extension ones are not IMHO. Then we can just mention that for the IoC + it uses Guice with a custom registration impl.
Le ven. 5 févr. 2021 à 17:13, Paul Hammant <p...@hammant.org.invalid> a écrit : > OK, my bad, I thought we were talking about Maven's internals for itself. > > Classloader trees, hidden implementations, security policies for the JVM > are stand out features that they nailed in 1995/6/7. > > I once drew a pretty pic of Tomcat's classloader setup - > https://paulhammant.com/images/tomcat_classloader.jpg - not from > actually knowledge, but from "that's how I would do it" > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 1:32 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > @Paul: not really, none define any behavior (note that the class loader > > tree implementation is a vendor choice, several certified EE servers do > > handle singleton per tree or per loader of the tree and it is compliant). > > Only @inject tests are > > > > > https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/injection-tck/blob/2ef97bfc0439f28730d4d1793f1ef9ff21309450/src/main/java/org/atinject/tck/auto/Convertible.java#L176 > > which are mainly smoke tests to let vendors handle instances as they want > > (proxy or not, eager vs lazy, scope/context definition etc). All that > still > > leads to the fact that the Maven IoC is not obvious on our doc, no? > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > < > > > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > > > > > Le ven. 5 févr. 2021 à 13:55, Paul Hammant <p...@hammant.org.invalid> a > > écrit : > > > > > > > > > > JSR 330 has a TCK that defines a lot. A system that purports to > > > facilitate > > > > injection into contained components (plugins or lesser) doesn’t have > to > > > > implement all facets of that TCK but could do so out of the box by > just > > > > using (say) guice or dagger in a class loader tree implementation. > > > > > >
