Great to see the enthusiasm. I also expected more work to be done for this
release, but apparently that's not the case (if we aren't missing something
else).

As Romain is saying, I think we should put some work into documenting. At
least some of the new changes. Maarten Mulders and I are working on
documenting all reactor changes, listed under MNGSITE-444 [1]. Have we
documented other big features, like the Maven Wrapper and Build/Consumer
POM already? If not, should we make tickets for it? Also, not sure whether
this is required for alpha-1.

Regarding MNG-6772 / MNG-6397 / MRESOLVER-168, I think we can either try to
include all in this release, or make that part of alpha-2. I'm unfamiliar
with the consequences, so I'll let you decide that ;) Let me know if I can
help.

Regards,
Martin

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNGSITE-444

Op zo 11 apr. 2021 om 20:07 schreef Romain Manni-Bucau <
[email protected]>:

> +1, I just suspect we should be clear on the status of this alpha (unstable
> and unexpected to hit CI for ex) and breaking changes which can break again
> in final potentially (this is what generally upset people with alpha/beta
> and prevent their usage in later versions). In any case having some preview
> is generally always worth it before ;).
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >
>
>
> Le dim. 11 avr. 2021 à 17:59, Michael Osipov <[email protected]> a
> écrit :
>
> > Attention: MNG-6772 is already on master and Robert and me have decided
> > to reopen it to give it more thought. It must be reverted from master
> > first before you cut a release until we have decided how to procede with
> > this as well as related MNG-6397.
> >
> > Except that I see no reason not to continue with alpha-1. I am certain
> > that this is a good release, but we will require more rounds of it.
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > Am 2021-04-11 um 17:32 schrieb Hervé BOUTEMY:
> > > cutting 4.0.0-alpha release: very good idea!!!
> > >
> > > on the 3 issues, I can tell that MNG-6397 is a long standing issue that
> > looks
> > > relevant (caused by MNG-6772 [1] that better describes it)
> > >
> > > But I don't see why this particular issue is an absolute must for
> > 4.0.0-alpha:
> > > I would propose to mark it for 4.0.x-candidate
> > >
> > >
> > > And I'm interested in people wanting to help on it (in a separate
> > thread).
> > >
> > >
> > > on the question of cutting the first alpha release, shouldn't we
> include
> > Maven
> > > Resolver 1.7.0? It would help to have MRESOLVER-168 to work on
> > MNG-6772...
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Hervé
> > >
> > >
> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6772
> > >
> > > Le dimanche 11 avril 2021, 16:19:49 CEST Martin Kanters a écrit :
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> I am wondering if we have a good idea of what we want to have finished
> > >> before cutting the first 4.0.0-alpha release.
> > >> I would love to work towards the actual release, and thus am wondering
> > >> whether there's a list of issues we can finish.
> > >> When selecting all unresolved issues targeted for 4.0.0-alpha-1, JIRA
> > comes
> > >> up with just 3 issues, which I'm not sure if they are still relevant.
> > [1]
> > >> I guess there might be more we need to include in the version, but
> > that's
> > >> unknown to me.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Martin
> > >>
> > >> [1]
> > >>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-5&jql=project%20%3D%20MNG%20A
> > >>
> >
> ND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%204.0.0-alpha-1%
> > >> 20order%20by%20priority%20DESC%2Cupdated%20DESC
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to