Hi all, to complete Sławomir description, the rational of Slack proposal to run it instead of adding a new toggle to just fail is that the logic to detect the described case is exactly the same so when we have detected that, either we fail with the new toggle + ignore it by default or we try to run tests as expected by the user since he put them here with the right dependencies - at least it is the rational, run once we know instead of letting the user tune and have a complex configuration.
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le mar. 2 nov. 2021 à 19:46, Slawomir Jaranowski <s.jaranow...@gmail.com> a écrit : > Hi, > > When multiple test frameworks are present on project classpath surefire > chooses one framework for running the tests. > > In such situations, some tests are silently skipped. > > > I've created issue [1] for it with a simple proposition. > > After discussion on slack another proposition was in place to detect the > test framework with other dependencies and choose a proper provider. > > Or use multiple providers instead of only one. > > > It will be good to choose how to solve this problem. > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1954 > > -- > Sławomir Jaranowski > > https://twitter.com/SlawekJaran > https://github.com/slawekjaranowski > https://linkedin.com/in/slawomirjaranowski >
