Hi, I really mean runtime ...
Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise On 19.07.22 18:28, Tamás Cservenák wrote:
Howdy, Running or building? As for building, I am all for it. For running (so the bytecode level of built Maven artifacts) may be "too soon" IMHO, I am unsure about this.
Spring Framework 3.0.0 (will do so) as well as Spring Boot etc. very large frameworks...
Hence, I'd go with enforcer to require JDK17, but use compiler release=11 for now.
I would suggest to go that path anyway to use JDK17 and produce via --release 8 (from current perspective)...
Note: key component, like sisu inject does NOT support (yet) Java17 bytecode.
Hm.. that might be blocker... Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise
T On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 6:25 PM Karl Heinz Marbaise <khmarba...@gmx.de <mailto:khmarba...@gmx.de>> wrote: Hi to all, what do you think about using JDK17 as minimum requirement for running the future Apache Maven 4.0.0 ? Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org <mailto:dev-h...@maven.apache.org>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
