+1 for moving braces to the end line, it is difficult especially with
lambda expression


śr., 12 paź 2022 o 18:52 Tamás Cservenák <[email protected]> napisał(a):

> +1 for  this formatting change.
>
> T
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2022, 18:23 Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Related to the discussion about automatically formatting and sorting
> > imports, I think it would be nice, given the big reformat commits if
> those
> > PRs are to be merged, to eventually discuss some changes to those code
> > style.  In particular, I found out that the code is very sparse and my
> > screen is more wide than height, which means I can usually only see 30-40
> > lines of code, where sometime half of them do not really carry any
> semantic
> > (open braces, or things like close brace + else + open brace on 3 lines).
> > This makes me scroll a lot even on quite small methods to be able to read
> > the full code, and that's a pain imho.
> > So I'd like to propose the following changes that would make maven code
> > more readable imho (and also closer to the usual java coding style) :
> >   * move open braces to the end of the previous line on all places
> >   * allow the else keyword to be directly following a closing brace to
> > allow "} else {" to be on the same line
> >   * eventually relax a bit the checkstyle line length as described in
> > https://github.com/gnodet/maven-shared-resources/pull/2.  This has not
> > much
> > effect, as the formatter will automatically format the lines and wrap
> them
> > at 120. However, in certain cases, the formatter can find in difficult to
> > wrap the line (for example with a variable declaration and cast with a
> > fully qualified name) and there is either a need to manually force the
> wrap
> > (using an end of line comment for example) or disabling the check with a
> > @SuppressWarning( "checkstyle:LineLength" ) annotation. This change only
> > removes the checks so that in those rare cases, the formatter can be left
> > without any need to force things.
> >
> > If this is to be accepted, I'd amend the PRs from the other thread to
> > follow those changes.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Guillaume
> >
>


-- 
Sławomir Jaranowski

Reply via email to