It is not a draft:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9116

Source:
https://securitytxt.org

Yes, I know apache.org has their own page, and I would not add any
contradicting information. In fact, there's a policy field taking an
URL which should point to the apache.org policy
(https://www.apache.org/security/#reporting-a-vulnerability).

-Ben

Am So., 20. Nov. 2022 um 19:32 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau
<rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
>
> Hi,
>
> AFAIK it is still a draft which can not go anywhere (or go elsewhere like
> .security/ for some exposure reason since .well-known already has adoption
> and rules) and I didn't see it much adopted yet. However at apache we have
> kind of standards for that so isn't it too early to adopt it?
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>
>
> Le dim. 20 nov. 2022 à 18:48, Benjamin Marwell <bmarw...@apache.org> a
> écrit :
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > Due to the recent GH activities (eg [1]), it came to my attention that
> > there is no file ".well-known/security.txt" on maven.apache.org.
> >
> > We really should adopt it!
> > For some more information, please refer to [2].
> >
> > WDYT?
> >
> > - Ben
> >
> > [1]: https://github.com/apache/maven-project-utils/pull/5
> > [2]: https://developer.okta.com/blog/2021/10/19/intro-security-txt
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> >
> >

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Reply via email to