On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 3:18 PM Christoph Läubrich <m...@laeubi-soft.de> wrote:
> Another point is that currently we reuse signatures attached by m-pgp-p > for embedding them in other meta-data as well (p2 repository) so if only > the deploy will generate the signature and do not make it accessible we > would need to generate the signature again. > > But all these problems are gone if there is a P2 connector, right? :) > > so I guess a plugin could make use of signer as well... > > > I thought so because how would m-pgp-p make use of it then? > In the first mail I explained the "fate" of m-gpg-p, it will possibly just "configure" things, and will not sign anything.
