My assumption: have you tried SHA-256 with aether.connector.smartChecksums disabled?
T On Sat, Apr 22, 2023, 07:18 Tamás Cservenák <[email protected]> wrote: > Howdy, > > This sounds strange, will try to reproduce it. One remark though: checksum > names as mentioned in doco are case sensitive... > > T > > On Fri, Apr 21, 2023, 23:47 Jeremy Landis <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Since maven 3.9.0, sha 256/512 checksums no longer are being pulled if >> available and requested either through command line are or maven.config. >> Has this been reported? Dropping back to maven 3.8.8 it works again. >> >> Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone >> Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> >> ________________________________ >> From: Tamás Cservenák <[email protected]> >> Sent: Friday, April 21, 2023 9:33:38 AM >> To: Maven Developers List <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] Maven 3.9.2 is around the corner >> >> Howdy, >> >> There is one (IMHO) blocker bug reported for resolver 1.9.8 >> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fissues.apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FMRESOLVER-352&data=05%7C01%7C%7Cea21ea9209154ca1771708db426d134b%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C638176808464235323%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=oultEa5oVRUabJrPG615pTRAnUR%2FR7k1321Fj8Lcm1U%3D&reserved=0 >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-352> >> >> That means Maven 3.9.2 needs to wait for bugfix release of resolver (if >> nothing else crops up). >> >> Thanks >> T >> >> On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 4:04 PM Tamás Cservenák <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > Howdy, >> > >> > The 3.9.2 is nearly done: >> > >> > >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fissues.apache.org%2Fjira%2Fissues%2F%3Fjql%3Dproject%2520%253D%2520MNG%2520AND%2520fixVersion%2520%253D%25203.9.2&data=05%7C01%7C%7Cea21ea9209154ca1771708db426d134b%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C638176808464235323%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=AVt2ekkafWkdjn0R6UMxgwm9Xux6utXvmu%2Ffaw%2FM7BE%3D&reserved=0 >> < >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MNG%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%203.9.2 >> > >> > >> > There are some candidates as well: >> > >> > >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fissues.apache.org%2Fjira%2Fissues%2F%3Fjql%3Dproject%2520%253D%2520MNG%2520AND%2520fixVersion%2520%253D%25203.9.x-candidate&data=05%7C01%7C%7Cea21ea9209154ca1771708db426d134b%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C638176808464235323%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=p2Hmmf0BP2V%2FFBePFHg3%2BDBW2IvnvtgT6hZzkNAX0a8%3D&reserved=0 >> < >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MNG%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%203.9.x-candidate >> > >> > >> > As usual, please raise your voice if there are some other issues not in >> > these two sets above, or if you have a candidate that should be moved to >> > 3.9.2. >> > >> > Thanks >> > T >> > >> >
