On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 10:47 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yep but this is also something an OSS product don't want to rely on (ie > particular vendor specificities which can change), so we should probably > stick to the global dates and align on these ones consistently. > Yes, but that principle implies the opposite. We should not rely on the particular vendor specificities of Oracle's commercial release, including when they decide to stop supporting JDK 8. The open source release of JDK 8 is available and will continue to be so for years. It is supported and maintained by multiple companies, organizations, and individuals, not just Oracle. It is an active project with quarterly releases and many active committers: https://wiki.openjdk.org/display/jdk8u/Main -- Elliotte Rusty Harold elh...@ibiblio.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
