Vincent, Thanks for all the work you did on this. I wish I'd been around to get in on the discussion - I think we still may have to consider how we handle this inheritence in RC3 if it is going to break builds.
I'm a bit concerned that you've jumped in and changed the maven-plugins CVS without much consensus from the other developers though - last I read there was some disagreement about what the structure should be. I actually think the plugin-parent directory works best for now, so I'm happy as is - everyone else ok? Ideally, I would think that the project file should just be named project-parent.xml in the root directory - but that doesn't work with the magic filenames of project.properties and build.properties (so I'm all for removing magic filenames in future versions of Maven other than project.xml and calling for explicit references from the POM as to where the other bits are located). Less magic is a good thing. Well documented defaults are even better. - Brett > -----Original Message----- > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, 3 May 2004 7:34 AM > To: 'Maven Developers List' > Subject: plugin sites have been rebuilt... > > > FYI, I've just rebuilt all the plugin web sites. > > Boy, that was long and memory hungry! I had given the JVM > 512M of RAM and it could only reach letter J of the plugins. > I had to do it chunck by chunck. We still have a memory > problem somewhere it seems. > > -Vincent > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
