Bubble up. Or where I can file an issue to track if it's likely an improvement.
Best, tison. tison <[email protected]> 于2023年9月23日周六 09:48写道： > The "usePhrasedClassNameInRunning" property in > "JUnit5StatelessTestsetInfoReporter" helps a bit: > > @DisplayName("FsTest") > public class FsTest extends BehaviorTest { > // ... > } > > [INFO] Running FsTest AsyncWriteTest > [ERROR] Tests run: 4, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: > 0.636 s <<< FAILURE! -- in FsTest AsyncWriteTest > [ERROR] > org.apache.opendal.behavior.BehaviorTest$AsyncWriteTest.testReadFull -- > Time elapsed: 0.594 s <<< FAILURE! > java.lang.AssertionError: > > But not in the very end summary: > > [INFO] Results: > [INFO] > [ERROR] Failures: > [ERROR] > org.apache.opendal.behavior.BehaviorTest$AsyncWriteTest.testReadFull > [ERROR] Run 1: BehaviorTest$AsyncWriteTest.testReadFull:110 > > You can clone https://github.com/apache/incubator-opendal/pull/3161 and > fail some tests case conditionally for debugging. > > Best, > tison. > > > tison <[email protected]> 于2023年9月23日周六 01:17写道： > >> To demostrate the expected manner, I want: >> >> [ERROR] Tests run: 4, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: >> 0.535 s <<< FAILURE! - in >> org.apache.opendal.behavior.BehaviorTest$AsyncWriteTest >> [ERROR] >> org.apache.opendal.behavior.BehaviorTest$AsyncWriteTest.testReadFull Time >> elapsed: 0.491 s <<< FAILURE! >> java.lang.AssertionError: >> >> to be: >> >> [ERROR] Tests run: 4, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: >> 0.535 s <<< FAILURE! - in >> org.apache.opendal.behavior.BehaviorTest$AsyncWriteTest >> [ERROR] >> org.apache.opendal.behavior.FsTest>org.apache.opendal.behavior.BehaviorTest$AsyncWriteTest.testReadFull >> Time elapsed: 0.491 s <<< FAILURE! >> java.lang.AssertionError: >> >> Or other approach to specify the actual test class. >> >> Best, >> tison. >> >> >> tison <[email protected]> 于2023年9月23日周六 01:11写道： >> >>> See https://github.com/junit-team/junit5/issues/3475 for details. >>> >>> Perhaps JUnit5ConsoleOutputReporter is related but I failed to located >>> the certain line constructing the test method name. >>> >>> Best, >>> tison. >>> >>
