Went through the two cases, I believe that they are fine (or more logical than 
before):

1. Change in link style:
before:
> <code>
>  <a href="#fast">&lt;fast&gt;</a>
> </code>

after:
> <a href="#fast">
>   <code>&lt;fast&gt;</code>
> </a>

Definition of <code> says [1]: A few other elements belong to this category, 
but only if a specific condition is fulfilled:

    <a>, if it contains only phrasing content

I don't know wether this applies. I'd rather format the link than the code with 
link, like done now.

2. No link highlight of target anchors:before:
> <section>
>   <h4>
>     <a name="a.3CexcludeDefaultDirectories.3E"></a>
>     <b>
>       <a 
> name="excludeDefaultDirectories">&lt;excludeDefaultDirectories&gt;</a>
>     </b>
>   </h4>
> ...

after:
<a name="Parameter_Details"></a>
<a name="excludeDefaultDirectories">
>   <section>
>     <h4>
>       <a 
> name="a.3CexcludeDefaultDirectories.3E"></a>&lt;excludeDefaultDirectories&gt;
>     </h4>
>     <a name="a.3CexcludeDefaultDirectories.3E"></a>
>   </a>
...

Previously, the anchor (where we jump to) was highlighted although it does not 
jump anywhere. I'd expect to highlight if you want to jump somewhere and not 
from.

Note that with the Doxia 2.0.0 stack it will further simplify and we will 
review this again.

Konrad, maybe you want to add some words?

[1] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/code

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Reply via email to