Adopt-OpenJ9 is now Semeru, and their v21 will be released next week if I
am not mistaken.

I'd love to keep that in, because it is the only JVM which does not run on
hotspot.




On Wed, 10 Jan 2024, 15:40 Slawomir Jaranowski, <s.jaranow...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> śr., 10 sty 2024 o 13:58 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> napisał(a):
>
> > Hi Elliotte,
> >
> > think it was a no luck phenomenon (probably due to the load the matrix
> put
> > on github OSS runners/infra).
> > That said there is a misconfiguration in the GH Actions yaml about
> version
> > 21 but this one is less misterious:
> >
> > Error: Could not find satisfied version for SemVer '21'.
> >
>
> It is a problem, some of the distributions don't have a JDK 21.
> like adopt-openj9,
> we need exclude it
>
>
>
> >
> > Best,
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > <
> >
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> > >
> >
> >
> > Le mer. 10 janv. 2024 à 13:31, Elliotte Rusty Harold <elh...@ibiblio.org
> >
> > a
> > écrit :
> >
> > > If anyone has a minute to take a look. I see various failures on
> > > different dependabot PRs that have nothing to do with their content.
> > > E.g.
> > >
> > > Error: Internal server error occurred while resolving
> > > "actions/checkout@v4". Internal server error occurred while resolving
> > > "actions/setup-java@v4". Internal server error occurred while
> > > resolving "actions/upload-artifact@v4"
> > >
> > > https://github.com/apache/maven-javadoc-plugin/pull/263
> > >
> > > --
> > > Elliotte Rusty Harold
> > > elh...@ibiblio.org
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Sławomir Jaranowski
>

Reply via email to