Brian, any Chance you could make a stacked 100% graph for every *week* of the past two years? We could then see where we are heading… (or the raw numbers per week, so we could work with that).
That's probably a lot to ask, but I think it will show us how "fast" the progression was (and will be). @Tamas please consider the support times are different by vendor. I have seen Java 8 support well beyond 2030 *shudder*. Seeing all those numbers, I now feel a lot more confident that Maven 4 should be 17 (runtime), 21 (build) and Java 8 users should stay with 3.x.x. Elliotte gave a good reason for this: There are two camps now (read: ALREADY). There is no reason to not go with either of them. Am Do., 22. Feb. 2024 um 19:56 Uhr schrieb Brian Fox <bri...@infinity.nu>: > > We dumped 30 days because that gives a good snapshot of what's happening > right now. If we dumped for example the whole year, then it really blurs > the lines all over the place and things newer will be less prominent just > because they didn't have as much time. 30 days is how we typically bucket > things when we want a form of relative popularity. > > As far as toy projects skewing, Tamas is right, the scale of central data > is so large that it's insignificant. Also remember we only counted each IP > once per entry so even projects downloading over and over won't skew the > results. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
