Delany, tried to recreate: https://github.com/cstamas/delany-ml-repro
And I may miss something, but it works for me? T On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 1:31 PM Tamás Cservenák <ta...@cservenak.net> wrote: > Delany, > > What goal do you invoke to get this? "mvn validate"? > Do you have any plugin bound to this phase? > > T > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 3:54 PM Delany <delany.middle...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> If a pom says it has a dependency "<version>2.4.1-SNAPSHOT</version>" then >> I don't want the validation failing in offline mode because >> "2.4.1-20240322.141808-12 has not been downloaded". >> Delany >> >> >> On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 at 16:15, Tamás Cservenák <ta...@cservenak.net> >> wrote: >> >> > Delany, >> > >> > What do you mean by "All SNAPSHOT versions are equal"? >> > >> > T >> > >> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 10:33 AM Delany <delany.middle...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Ok, I want to validate various aspects of the project without going >> > network >> > > since there are a lot of modules, some of them quite big, and they get >> > > rebuilt every day, so its hundreds of Mb that get updated. >> > > I want to check the well-formedness of the pom.xml files, sort them, >> also >> > > run a yak4j-filename-conventions-maven-plugin, etc. >> > > All things to do with the integrity of the files and the configuration >> > > model that's unrelated to classes and dependencies. >> > > Probably a lot of these should actually be handled with git hooks, but >> > for >> > > various reasons that's not currently an option. >> > > I'm looking for a button to push that will say "All SNAPSHOT versions >> are >> > > equal". And you can add to that "from any repository". >> > > I get why you wouldn't want to introduce that though. Thanks for >> > answering. >> > > Delany >> > > >> > > >> > > On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 at 10:49, Tamás Cservenák <ta...@cservenak.net> >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > > Howdy, >> > > > >> > > > you are conflating several things here: >> > > > - timestamped snapshots are coming from remote (as locally installed >> > ones >> > > > are NOT timestamped), these snapshots can be resolved ONLY via >> metadata >> > > > - artifact origin tracking: if artifact A was downloaded from >> > repository >> > > > R1, a subsequent build run on same local repo that does not have R1 >> > > defined >> > > > (obviously, R1 cannot be central) will NOT have A reported as >> > "available" >> > > > only as it is present on disk (Maven2 did this, Maven3 fixed did >> this). >> > > > - update policy is unrelated to both above >> > > > >> > > > Hence, to me your question does not make sense. >> > > > Let me reverse: what is your goal you want to achieve? >> > > > >> > > > T >> > > > >> > > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 9:21 AM Delany <delany.middle...@gmail.com> >> > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > Hi, >> > > > > >> > > > > I have a bunch of plugins like enforcer that I want to run with >> `mvn >> > > > > validate -o` but I get >> > > > > Cannot access *repo* in offline mode and the artifact >> > > > > *artifact*:jar:2.4.1-20240322.141808-12 has not been downloaded >> from >> > it >> > > > > before >> > > > > >> > > > > There are snapshots of that artifact available in local maven >> repo, >> > > just >> > > > > not that specific one. >> > > > > I thought changing the updatePolicy to NEVER would solve this, but >> > the >> > > > new >> > > > > enforcer (which now uses resolver) fails nonetheless. >> > > > > >> > > > > Is there a way to get resolver to treat all snapshots as equal in >> > > offline >> > > > > mode? Is there a reason this isn't the default? >> > > > > >> > > > > Thanks, >> > > > > Delany >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> >
