Howdy, While I somewhat agree, I think that "Maven module" is clear when used in context, also Maven was there before JPMS ;) And finally, as you pointed out, POM will always have a "module" as well. Hence, I am unsure about the value of this terminology change... Yes, it is longer to type "maven module" and "java module" but it is still clear what we talk about ...
Thanks T On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 2:14 PM Martin Desruisseaux < martin.desruisse...@geomatys.com> wrote: > In order to avoid confusion between "Maven module" and "Java module", I > suggest to update documentation for using "Maven sub-project" instead of > "Maven module". However, the <module> XML elements in the POM would be > unchanged for compatibility reason. There is apparently not so many > places in the documentation that need to be updated. The ones that I > found are part of pull request #1625: > > > https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/1625/commits/4bc46b4114396e6025645f3c5dae888f3d386981 > > Martin > >
