Michael, Is it worth updating our Maven Parent pom with released versions or should we wait until Doxia 2 GA?
Sylwester śr., 28 sie 2024, 13:21 użytkownik Michael Osipov <micha...@apache.org> napisał: > Am 2024-08-28 um 03:27 schrieb Basil Crow: > > Hi Michael, > > > > Many thanks for your hard work on this stack over the past three > > years. Is Maven Fluido Skin 2.0.0-M10 safe to adopt? I notice > > Dependabot is not offering it because of its milestone status, but > > Dependabot is offering Maven Site Plugin 3.20.0, which seems to > > require a newer version of Maven Fluido Skin to avoid > > > >> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-site-plugin:3.20.0:site (default-site) on > project jellydoc-maven-plugin: Failed to create context for skin: Cannot > use skin: has [1.11.1,2.0.0-M1) Doxia Sitetools prerequisite, but current > is 2.0.0-M19 > > > > Is there a plan to release a non-milestone version of Maven Fluido Skin? > > Please use 3.20.0 with Fluido Skin 2.0.0-M10. It will work. > > According to my plan the GA versions are about to be released from end > of September. See the timeline in the headsup annoucement. > > Michael > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >
