Nice work! However, if may clash, it's used differently in executions. Better use g:, a: and v:, and other fields instead of one long id. Makes updates easier, too, as well as scrolling through the document. What do you think?
Otherwise, like tamas said: go for it. I also like the idea of creating a proposal repo. - Ben On Wed, 5 Mar 2025, 17:16 Guillaume Nodet, <gno...@apache.org> wrote: > Hey ! > > A while ago, I created a Hocon based POM parser [1], leveraging Maven > 4 new capabilities to support new syntaxes for POMs. > However, as much as that syntax seems interesting, I've been pointed > that it's not really supported. So I never actually released it. > But I'd still like to get out a new syntax and so I wrote one to > support the well known YAML syntax. I thus created a small extension > to support it [2]. > It's much more concise wrt GAV ids and especially dependencies [3]. > > So I'd like to get it into the Maven project and release it. > > [1] https://github.com/apache/maven-hocon-extension > [2] https://github.com/gnodet/maven-yaml-extension > [3] > https://github.com/gnodet/maven-yaml-extension/blob/master/src/test/resources/dependency-gav.yaml#L21-L30 > > -- > ------------------------ > Guillaume Nodet > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >
