yes, we should check what we can, not only what we want

given what we want vote is only on the minimal step, I'm +1
but eager on seeing how we can implement it (without going more aggressive)

for next steps, seing what we can will be a strong prerequisite on voting on it

Regards,

Hervé

On 2025/08/05 13:16:31 Konrad Windszus wrote:
> Hi Sandra,
> AFAIK only prevent force push is evaluated by Gitbox. Do you have any 
> reference about the branch deletion part?
> I am not against it, just highlighting that you can bypass it.
> 
> Thanks,
> Konrad
> 
> > On 5. Aug 2025, at 13:45, Sandra Parsick <san...@parsick.dev> wrote:
> > 
> > As discussed in a previous thread, it makes sense from a supply chain 
> > security perspective to introduce the following branch protection rules to 
> > all Maven repositories:
> > 
> > - Prevent force push
> > - Prevent branch deletion
> > 
> > It will be enabled by .asf.yaml to ensure that the same branch protection 
> > rules are used for Gitbox and GitHub.
> > 
> > It will be enabled for all default and maintenance branches.
> > 
> > 
> > Tasks to do:
> > - Check every Maven repository has .asf.yaml
> > - Enabling above-mentioned branch protection rules in all Maven 
> > repositories via .asf.yaml
> > 
> > 
> > If the vote passes, I will take care of it.
> > 
> > 
> > Vote open for at least 72 hours.
> > 
> > [ ] +1
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1
> > 
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Reply via email to