+1 On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 10:39 AM Benjamin Marwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 for 3.9.x (we could use a more recent version than 3.9.0 due to bugs in > early versions of 3.9). > > - Ben > > On 8 November 2025 13:51:00 CET, Slawomir Jaranowski < > [email protected]> wrote: > >Hi, > > > >Maven 3.8.x is now marked as EOL [1] > > > >We have a page which describes the minimum requirements for a plugin > >[2] after the Maven version marking EOL. > >Last time we used the last EOL version, so consequently we should > >start using 3.8.3 for it. > > > >Currently we only use Maven 3.9.x in GitHub CI [3], so if we dedicate > >to use 3.8.3 we need to add it to be sure that plugins still support > >such a version. > > > >We also can start using 3.9.0 for plugins and not need to test the EOL > version. > > > >The question is which version of Maven should be now used as minimum > >requirements in plugins? > > > >1. 3.8.3 - with add to CI matrix > >2. 3.8.3 - without adding in CI matrix > >3. 3.9.0 - no extra version in CI matrix is needed > >4. don't care about it ... take a hope that will be not a problem > > > >So which one way do you prefer? > > > >[1] https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/842 > >[2] https://maven.apache.org/developers/compatibility-plan.html > >[3] https://github.com/apache/maven-gh-actions-shared/pull/207 > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
