On Thu, 2004-05-13 at 08:16, Jason van Zyl wrote: > On Thu, 2004-05-13 at 05:22, Heritier Arnaud wrote: > > Why must we replace Jelly ?? > > > > Isn't it better to correct/enhance it ???? > > The short answer is no, it's not. It's not being maintained by its > creator and someone would have to burn it to the ground and rebuild it > to make it decent.
what will be the impact in terms of compatibility? Will that requires many changes to the files in order to port them to m2? Jerome --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
