+1 for this idea about to focus more on 4.x
śr., 4 lut 2026, 17:52 użytkownik Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> napisał: > +1 to make v3 in maintenance mode and drop the useless abstractions in v4 > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://x.com/rmannibucau> | .NET Blog > <https://dotnetbirdie.github.io/> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.github.io/> > | Old > Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > < > https://www.packtpub.com/en-us/product/java-ee-8-high-performance-9781788473064 > > > Javaccino founder (Java/.NET service - contact via linkedin) > > > Le mer. 4 févr. 2026 à 13:16, Martin Desruisseaux via dev < > [email protected]> a écrit : > > > Hello Olivier > > > > Thanks a lot for this work! > > > > Le 04/02/2026 à 02:48, Olivier Lamy a écrit : > > > > > I wish we could be Java 9+ to be able to use ProcessHandle and really > > > simplify the class PpidChecker, which mixes parsing of ps on unix and > > > wmic for Windows. > > > > If the issue is not considered a blocking issue, maybe we do not need to > > spend too much energy on the 3.x branch and focus on Maven 4 soon? > > Alternatively, if resolving this issue on 3.x is considered important > > enough for being worth the effort, maybe use multi-release? > > > > Otherwise, the plan looks good to me. After this simplification, we > > would hopefully be able to finish Java Module support in a minimal set > > of Maven plugins. Even if there are many plugins not yet covered, I > > think that Surefire is the last critical plugin needing update for > > having a minimal support of Java modules in Maven. > > > > Martin > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > >
