Maven 3.9 as a minimum was already decided and documented in October 2025 https://github.com/apache/maven-site/blame/master/content/markdown/developers/compatibility-plan.md
this is a great plan to implement on upgrading minimum to 3.10, it's definitively too early: remember 3.10 is resolver 2, a transition for Maven 4, and is out just a few days ago, we're still at 3.10.0 on shared-utils and styled message API: I get that reverting back from shared-utils to plexus-utils makes shared-utils too big on overlapping classes. Styled message API is the only part of shared-utils that should remain, as it is where the code landed to NOT depend on Maven core. Why not create a new release of shared-utils that contains just the styled message API? This would remove the overlap with plexus-utils, while not introducing a prerequisite on Maven 3.10 Regards, Hervé On 2026/10/07 21:32:45 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: > Hi, > > Today I will go with 3.10.0 we have new API [1] like > - MessageBuilderFactory - we can drop maven-shared in many plugins > - we have java version in JavaToolchain > > 3.10.0 was released 2026-09-27 and I can see many issues with it ... > form some of days 3.10.0 is default on GH runners [2] > > > [1] > https://maven.apache.org/docs/3.10.0/release-notes.html#new-api-and-updates-for-maven-plugins > [2] https://github.com/actions/runner-images/releases > > > On Wed, 7 Oct 2026 at 23:09, Sylwester Lachiewicz <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > A year ago we discussed the minimum Maven version for ASF plugins [1]. > > Slawomir proposed four options, and his summary on 2025-11-13 lists ten > > +1s for > > 3.9.0. The compatibility plan was updated accordingly [2][3]: > > > > "In October 2025, Maven before 3.8.3 has been marked as EOL, meaning that > > plugins should use 3.9.0 as minimum (as per Mailing List)" > > > > Many plugins still declare <prerequisites><maven>3.6.3</maven>, so I would > > like > > to clarify what that thread decided. Two questions: > > > > 1. Was that thread a formal vote, or a show of hands to be confirmed by a > > [VOTE]? > > 2. Should we raise the prerequisite to 3.9.0 across our plugins, or keep > > the existing 3.6.3 and update the compatibility plan to reflect that? > > > > This is only about the outcome of last year's thread. This is only about > > the outcome of last year's thread. It is not Maven 3.10.0 or about adopting > > new APIs. > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/s2dvm1jg37vhrkkkplfknk494c68zfyv > > [2] https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/1456 > > [3] https://maven.apache.org/developers/compatibility-plan.html > > > > Regards, > > Sylwester > > > > > -- > Sławomir Jaranowski > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
