On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 13:49, Eric Pugh wrote: > I like the idea.. me too
> Would the next logical step be to verify as well that > anything in plugin.properties was listed in the properties.xml file? It > seems that pretty much anything in plugin.properties should be documented. sounds good to me. > You could also apply the same logic to goals as well. In that case, maybe the proposal should be reworked into using an XML file called plugin-doc.xml where properties are just a sub part of the full tree. Goals would be added. That makes it more extensible, and then you don't have hundreds of files for your doc. Jerome --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
