Nice. On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 06:50:53 -0400, Steve Caswell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > <sheepishly grinning>I guess that would help, wouldn't it :)</sheepishly > grinning> > > http://sqlcli.sourceforge.net/javadoc-audit-report.html > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Heritier Arnaud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 6:46 AM > > To: Maven Developers List > > Subject: RE : Javadoc report plugin > > > > > > Where is the link ?? > > > > Arnaud > > > > > -----Message d'origine----- > > > De : Steve Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Envoyé : mercredi 21 juillet 2004 12:42 > > > À : 'Maven Developers List' > > > Objet : RE: Javadoc report plugin > > > > > > > > > Vincent, > > > > > > Here is a link to an example of the report. > > > > > > I'll submit a patch to Jira in the next few days. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 9:28 AM > > > > To: 'Maven Developers List' > > > > Subject: RE: Javadoc report plugin > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Steve, > > > > > > > > That sounds interesting. Do you have any link pointing to > > the report > > > > you're generating? > > > > > > > > I agree about linking it to the javadoc plugin. I think > > the best is > > > > for you to create a JIRA issue and attach a patch against > > the last > > > > CVS HEAD of the javadoc plugin. > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > -Vincent > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Steve Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Sent: mardi 20 juillet 2004 14:41 > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Subject: Javadoc report plugin > > > > > > > > > > My colleagues and I have created a plugin that generates a > > > > formatted > > > > > Javadoc warning report very similar in style to the > > > > Checkstyle report. > > > > > I've read the > > > > > docs about sharing plugins, and understand the reasons for > > > > hosting plugins > > > > > separately. However, in this case, it seems that this > > > > plugin is so tied to > > > > > javadoc that it might make sense for the report to become > > > > part of the > > > > > standard javadoc plugin execution, similar to how the plain > > > > text javadoc > > > > > report is generated today. > > > > > > > > > > Is there any interest in adding a formatted warnings > > report to the > > > > > javadoc plugin? If there is I'll be happy to do the work > > > and submit > > > > > the changes. > > > > > > > > > > TIA. > > > > > > > > > > Steven Caswell > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > > > > > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > > > > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
-- http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
