The following comment has been added to this issue:

     Author: dion gillard
    Created: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 10:22 PM
       Body:
Separate the scm reports from the xdoc plugin:

We need new goals in the SCM project to register, perform and deregister the report.


Keep the gleaning of CVS info out of the org.apache.maven.project.Repository class:

"So would we have something like o.a.m.scm.cvs.Repository extends 
o.a.m.project.Repository or maybe o.a.m.scm.CvsRepository extends 
o.a.m.project.Repository?"

I'd rather we have a factory class in the SCM project that doesn't extend Repository, 
but uses it to create an SCM specific class, e.g. your CVS repo object above, which is 
data only, i.e. not tied to Repository

---------------------------------------------------------------------
View this comment:
  http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPXDOC-114?page=comments#action_22313

---------------------------------------------------------------------
View the issue:
  http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPXDOC-114

Here is an overview of the issue:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
        Key: MPXDOC-114
    Summary: cvs-usage presumes pserve protocol on <connection>
       Type: Bug

     Status: Open
   Priority: Major

 Original Estimate: Unknown
 Time Spent: Unknown
  Remaining: Unknown

    Project: maven-xdoc-plugin

   Assignee: Jason van Zyl
   Reporter: Erik Husby

    Created: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 4:10 PM
    Updated: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 10:22 PM

Description:
The Repository report makes some assumptions about ones use of cvs that are not 
necessarily true.

1. The pom.repository.connection is assumed to be the pserve protocol. Not true for 
our in-house projects.

2. The pom.repository.developerConnection is only displayed when there is a 
pom.repository.connection entry. The two fields are not connected.

3. The CVS Access behind firewall is always included if pom.repository.connection is 
specified. This is not true in our in-house environment.

The changelog report works fine if only pom.repository.developerConnection is 
specified, I would like to not specify pom.repository.connnection


Problem#1 can be addressed by examinging the cvs protocol and adjusting the comments.

Problem#2 I experimented with modifing the cvs-usage.xml but not being knowledge in 
velocity, I could not see why problem #2 occurs.

Problem#3 can be solved in a number of ways from an addition to the pom.repository or 
by an additional maven-xdoc-plugin property.




---------------------------------------------------------------------
JIRA INFORMATION:
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.

If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa

If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to