Trygve Laugstøl wrote on Saturday, September 18, 2004 3:03 PM: > +1 for the change. It should be pretty easy to make a better POM > validator/fixer. There is quite a few issues with the > existing poms that should be adressed and tried fixed with a > better validator. This will also help pom version migration.
The POM validation currently also fails, if you try to use a property to define your SCM conenction, since it insists on 6 parts. - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
