On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 23:46, Michal Maczka wrote:
> This is something which has a very long history.
>
> I change in many months ago but it was reverted back to use
> ${pom.artifactId}.war
> simply becouse some people just want to take war produced by maven in
> target directory
> and use it without any changes - as for some servlet containers the name
> of the war = the name of the context root.
So what happens when you have the next version of the webapp that must
live in conjunction with the older version? As with anything in Maven I
think not having the version in the name of the artifact is a serious
liability. You can overwrite one with another without noticing
immediately and who knows what else. I build WARs with something else so
I have no personal concern but I think from the general perspective of
Maven artifacts without versions is simply bad form.
> michal
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Startuj z INTERIA.PL!!! >>> http://link.interia.pl/f1837
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://maven.apache.org
happiness is like a butterfly: the more you chase it, the more it will
elude you, but if you turn your attention to other things, it will come
and sit softly on your shoulder ...
-- Thoreau
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
