ah... no.
We can't put it on ibiblio because of this:
(i) you distribute the Software complete and unmodified and only bundled as
part
of, and for the sole purpose of running, your Java applets or applications
("Programs"),
Do you intend to distribute your code with a Sun license?
(v) you only distribute the Software subject to
a license agreement that protects Sun's interests consistent with the terms
contained
in this Agreement,
Do you intend to indemnify Sun if a lawsuit arises from it's use?
(vi) you agree to defend and indemnify Sun and its licensors
from and against any damages, costs, liabilities, settlement amounts and/or
expenses
(including attorneys' fees) incurred in connection with any claim, lawsuit or
action
by any third party that arises or results from the use or distribution of any
and all
Programs and/or Software."
- Brett
Eric Pugh wrote:
>Fantastic.. I hate licensing issues, so when I saw them there, I too
>thought about those sleeping dogs! But, I knew if it was a mistake and
>I depended on them, I would get bit.
>
>So, that is great news, and the way I read the license seems okay as
>well. I think in Apache-land there has evolved a lot of FUD about
>licensing, especially since are developers first, and lawyers second!
>
>Out of curiosity, what do you mean by the property:
>maven.repo.remote=http://mirrors.sunsite.dk/maven,http://www.ibiblio.org
>/maven?
>
>Is that something for all of Maven, or something you are suggesting for
>commons-email?
>
>Eric
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Vincent Siveton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 7:46 AM
>To: Maven Developers List
>Subject: Re: Jars on Ibiblio that shouldn't be?
>
>
>Hi,
>
>Already discussed:
>http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@maven.apache.org/msg08836.html
>
>Lets update this property:
>maven.repo.remote=http://mirrors.sunsite.dk/maven,http://www.ibiblio.org
>/maven
>
>Cheers,
>
>Vincent
>
>On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 16:40:23 +0100, Arnaud HERITIER
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Yes it's weird.
>>Both jars were upload on Nov 3rd.
>>I thought also that it was forbidden.
>>Is there someone who can check who uploaded these files.
>>
>>Arnaud
>>
>>
>>
>>>-----Message d'origine-----
>>>De : Eric Pugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>Envoyé : jeudi 3 mars 2005 16:24
>>>À : Maven-Dev
>>>Objet : Jars on Ibiblio that shouldn't be?
>>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>I was just testing commons-email which depends on javamail and
>>>activiation jars, and via a Maven build it work! It downloaded the
>>>javamail and activation jars from ibiblio. However, should those
>>>jars be there? Aren't there redistribution issues with Sun that
>>>prevent them?
>>>
>>>If these have been worked out then great! Those missing jars have
>>>been an unending pain to deal with....
>>>
>>>Eric
>>>
>>>
>>>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>-
>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
>>>additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
