[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPJXR-3?page=comments#action_31641 ] Achim Westermann commented on MPJXR-3: --------------------------------------
Jason did a good job for a similar request: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVEN-130 This would be good for jxr too. I am voting +1! Additionally I think configuration of multiple source folders in the project.xml might really clean up the hacking in maven.xml. I am bored of all this "re-think why you need several source folders...". Explanation why it's bad may be easy but explanation how to do without it for a mature project that uses it for reasonable purposes is harder. > Uses pom.build.sourceDirectory instead of maven.compile.src.set > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: MPJXR-3 > URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPJXR-3 > Project: maven-jxr-plugin > Type: Bug > Reporter: Vincent Massol > > > I believe this is also true for several other plugins (javadoc, etc). This > means that if you use something like: > <path id="maven.j2ee.compile.src.set" > location="${pom.build.sourceDirectory}/../j2ee${cactus.j2ee.version}"/> > <maven:addPath id="maven.compile.src.set" > refid="maven.j2ee.compile.src.set"/> > it won't work with several plugins... > I'm starting to think that allowing multiple source directories in > project.xml wouldn't be so bad at all and that there are valid cases (I > believe Cactus is one - I'm happy to discuss that though). > Thanks > -Vincent -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa - If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
