> I agree. But I don't think it's unnecessary, at least when used with > ant, and it's the first aim of ivy. But if you feel it's unnecessary > in maven, I'll never say you're wrong ! And if this is the case, I'm > afraid we won't be able to use poms as metadata. > I don't know how we keep coming back to this... I never suggested scope for configurations. I've suggested that Maven needs some sort of profile ability, that you could map configurations to that, and with that I think all the metadata is covered.
But I'd rather not rush that in as additions are not easily reversed, and it seems you're pretty happy with what you have, so that's fine. Cheers, Brett --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
