[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-336?page=comments#action_37847 ] Dan Diephouse commented on MNG-336: -----------------------------------
Just to be clear, my contention is that when parsing M1 POMs and converting them to M2 POMs you should convert from the + syntax to the new & improved artifactId/groupId format. I'm not suggesting that you support the '+' syntax in M2 poms. > support "+" in artifact, group id's > ----------------------------------- > > Key: MNG-336 > URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-336 > Project: m2 > Type: Improvement > Versions: 2.0-alpha-1 > Environment: all? > Reporter: John Casey > Fix For: 2.0-alpha-3 > > > See MNG-323. > This is not a repoclean issue, but since the issue filed originally is a > subtask of repoclean-related things, I'm creating a new instance of the issue > here. > The reason stax-1.1.1-dev wasn't being propagated to the m2 repository was > unrelated to this, and has been resolved (it's related to the problems we > were having with commons-logging-1.0.4) > Basically, Dan's contention is that we need to support the '+' character in > POM groupId's and artifactId's. > I'm not taking a position on this (not sure I agree that this is a good > idea), only relaying the info for more general consumption. I don't want this > issue to lose visibility as a subtask of a repoclean cleanup issue... -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
