On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 06:16:41PM +0200, Vincent Massol wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: dimanche 26 juin 2005 16:08 > > To: Maven Developers List > > Subject: RE: [m2] Forking a custom lifecycle in a report plugin? > > > > On Sun, 2005-06-26 at 12:39 +0200, Vincent Massol wrote: > > > Just realized I was missing a META-INF/plexus/components.xml file. Will > > > try with one. > > > > I'm taking a peek. How about we set you up with access to the m2 plugins > > in SVN and we can work on it from there? Anyone object to that? Getting > > the clover plugin working I think would be very nice. > > I'd like that now that I'm getting up to speed with m2. However WRT to the > Clover plugin we have 2 options: > - set it up @ apache > - set it up @ cenqua. They have opened an open source area and have invited > me there > > I'm not yet sure what makes the most sense. I'd like to get both your > opinion and theirs. I can see pros and cons of each.
I would say add it in the Apache repository first so we can all work on it as it might require changes in Maven 2 itself and having it in our repository just makes life easier for us. When it's getting close to a 1.0 release (or around the 2.0 final release of Maven 2) move it to Cenqua so they'll maintain it. Btw, it's really nice to see people having a OSS area and are willing to maintain the plugins for Maven. > > Thanks > -Vincent
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
