On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 10:29:43AM +0200, Vincent Massol wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Trygve Laugstøl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: mercredi 6 juillet 2005 10:21 > > To: Maven Developers List > > Subject: Re: Mixed plugins and functional tests for plugins? (was RE: [m2] > > Clvoer plugin location (was RE: [m2] Forking a customlifecycle in a report > > plugin?)) > > [snip] > > > I still think it would make more sense to make these functional tests > > normal JUnit tests and instead of having a tester plugin just have a > > simple tool for embedding Maven 2 because you still need to do assertions > > after you've executed Maven.
Got a opinion on this? > > How do you figure one should run the assertions with a tester plugin? > > The tester plugin would not have any assertion itself (apart from the > executing project failing). The tests are done by the executing plugin and > the verifier plugin can be used to perform high level assertions. Isn't the executing plugin the "real" plugin itself? -- Trygve
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
