On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 10:27:51AM -0700, Carlos Sanchez wrote: > hibernate should be in different groupIds because they have changed > the package names.
Right, ok. Then you could actually have both in your class path at the same time too. For Hibernate this actually makes sense now :) Still unsure about Ibatis though. -- Trygve > > On 7/8/05, Trygve Laugstøl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 10:14:15AM -0700, Carlos Sanchez wrote: > > > Ok, I can copy them in the repo > > > > > > hibernate 2.x to groupId net.sf.hibernate > > > hibernate 3.x to groupId org.hibernate > > > > > > ibatis 1.x to artifactId ibatis1 > > > ibatis 2.x to artifactId ibatis2 > > > > I don't think having different group ids is a good solution to this > > problem and probably just confusing to the users. I'm honestly not sure > > what the best solution is. Is it really possible to have both artifacts in > > the classpath at the same time? At least I would assume that this would > > depend on the ordering of the classpath. > > > > > > > > do you think this is the right way? > > > > Not sure, anybody else have a opinion? > > > > -- > > Trygve
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
