are you sure about this? i did never personally experience, and never heard that somebody had to add e.g. jsse.jar to the classpath, if it is in the jre/lib.
-solo. On 8/9/05, Kenney Westerhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, solo turn wrote: > > It's missing from the eclipse plugin. I've been meaning to change that, > but from what I could see there was some path/jdk specific content in the > 3.0 version. Can't find any reason not to change this for 3.1 though, > besides the fact that per default java apps don't get anything but > a rt.jar when run in a JRE. You can't be sure that the app is run from > within a full JDK. > > > running "m2 eclipse:eclipse" adds just rt.jar to the java build path, > > while creating a project with eclipse 3.1 adds: > > <classpathentry kind="con" path="org.eclipse.jdt.launching.JRE_CONTAINER"/> > > > > i'd prefer if the whole java libraries are added like eclipse does it. > > do i have to set this somewhere in the pom, or is it just a thing > > which is missing in the eclipse goal? > > > > -solo. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -- > Kenney Westerhof > http://www.neonics.com > GPG public key: http://www.gods.nl/~forge/kenneyw.key > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
