>From the plan below, I'm able to address a) and b), but currently I don't know how to enhance the POM (Item c)). So if anyone could implement c) I'm willing to provide a patch for the resource plugin.
Carsten Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > Now, what do you think of the following: > a) the resource plugin by default uses a filters.properties file (if > present) - we can of course use a different name/location. > > b) You can specify additional property files on the resource plugin. If > two property files contain the same property, the last one wins (or the > first one?) You can specify for each property file if the absence of the > file is an error. This allows to simply specify a "property.samples" and > the "property" file and it's not an error if the "property" file is > missing and the "property" file has precedence over the > "property.samples" file. > > c) The POM gets the filtering tags at the resource element: in this > filtering element you can specify which tokens are replaced. In addition > we provide a way to say: replace all tokens. This is to make it more > user friendly. > > WDYT? -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
