Hi, I'd like to add an optional scope to dependencies as a way to not pass them on to projects depending on your library. This would allow fixing things like dom4j that pull in extra dependencies.
If we don't do this, I believe scope=provided will be abused as using that will do it, and prevent us from changing that behaviour in future if desired. Thoughts? Anyone disagreeing has to provide a viable way to deal with dom4j and friends :) - Brett --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
