Mark, I like it! I'd been thinking about this and resolved not to change it, but we could certainly have both.
What do others think? - Brett Mark Hobson wrote: >Hi all, > >Now I'm sure this is a programming faux pas (and also badly timed >being so near to 2.0 final) but I've been pondering this since the >alpha1 days - what do people think of renaming the m2 executable to >mvn? The reasoning being: > >* m2 does differentiate from the m1 maven executable, but what happens >when m2.1 and m3 come out - do we keep changing the cmdline? > >* mvn still allows maven1 and maven2 to co-exist side-by-side, but is >also future-proof > >* mvn is a handy TLA like svn, cvs or ant and other tools people type >many times a day > >* the keys 'm', 'v' and 'n' are conveniently located almost >side-by-side on the same row > >* mvn is simply maven with the vowels dropped > >What do people think? I realise this is hardly a blocker but it's >good to get off my chest! > >Cheers, > >Mark > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
