On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 15:08 +1100, Brett Porter wrote: > Jason van Zyl wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 08:53 +1100, Brett Porter wrote: > > > >>Sounds fine to me (there is a design component that can be used). > > > > > > I think it would be more then design as the first one I can think of > > that is more task oriented is starting a campaign to find a lot more > > mirrors on the scale of CPAN for perl. > > Doesn't this belong in the long neglected MPA project?
Yes, and I think the point in the previous email of the the subscription throwing back issues to the list would prevent this from happening. As I'm the only one who put stuff there and I was occupied with other things so it falls into disuse and so no one even knows the issue was raised. > > Not that you can't go scan through the mailing list, but what is on the > > table could be more immediate and transparent then that's better. > > Sure. I wonder if the wiki isn't a better way to track it though? I think that's where the content will land but the simple fact that JIRA can toss back the items up for discussion back to list periodically will keep things on the radar. JIRA would purely handle the management of the issues and the issues themselves would most like point at the wiki. But the road map could be aligned with releases and serve to show what design and organization issues were dealt with for that release apart from the pure technical issues dealt with. > - Brett > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- jvz. Jason van Zyl jason at maven.org http://maven.apache.org We all have problems. How we deal with them is a measure of our worth. -- Unknown --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
